Exploring Interoperability between Rhino and Revit through Rhino.inside

A dual case study

Overview

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive interoperability workflow achieved between Rhino and Revit through Rhino-Inside. The study focuses on two case studies with different building type, where both of their curtainwalls utilize the integration of Rhino and Revit with two discrete workflow through Rhino-Inside. This integration enables the manipulations of Revit families through Grasshopper, seamlessly integrating a design platform with a BIM platform, harnessing the power of parametric design and data synchronization across platforms.

The first case study delves into a healthcare project that explores through modeling capabilities of Rhino, and interoperability of Rhino.inside, allowing a one-way lightweight import over to Revit. This case study demonstrates the potential for enhancing creativity and design exploration while keeping streamlined twin model for early phrase Revit development.

The second case study explores the Rhino-inside control further, where through Grasshopper, the Rhino model gets disassembled into the most basic understanding of Revit native curtainwalls, and leverages Rhino-inside to manipulate parameters on the model to establish a bidirectional data flow. This bidirectional data flow ensures that changes made in either Rhino or Revit are seamlessly integrated across both platforms, fostering a synchronized and updated project representation.

Through these two case studies, this paper highlights the transformative potential of the Rhino-Inside framework in enhancing interoperability between Rhino and Revit. The case study presents the significance of an integrated workflow that serves as a testament to the continual evolution of software interoperability, enabling professionals to explore innovative design solutions and streamline the design, BIM management, and construction documentation process.


Authors

Photo of Vincent Ip

Vincent Ip

Associate / Designer / NBBJ DIGITAL - Studio DC Leader

NBBJ

sfxvincent@gmail.com


Keywords

Paper content

Introduction

Figure 1: Physical Representation vs Level of Development(LOD) of a Revit Model in various phase and where Rhino/Grasshopper/Rhino.Inside ties into each phase

The field of architecture has seen an

Access Restricted

Footnotes

Access Restricted

Acknowledgements

The author wish to acknowledge and thank the team in NBBJ Los Angeles, Boston and Hong Kong studio, especially Sam Keville and Leo Li.

All images are provided courtesy of the author and NBBJ unless otherwise stated.

Access Restricted

Rights and Permissions

BIMForum (2023) 2023 Level of Development Specification Guide. http://bimforum.org/lod/. Accessed 20 January 2024

Ip, Vincent. “Managing Constraints- An Integrated Design to Construction Workflow”, Facade Tectonics 2020 World Congress,2020

Crolla, Kristof. “Building Simplexity – The expansion of digital design into “contractor space”, In W. Huang, Y. Liu, W. Xu (eds.), Digital Infiltration & Parametricism: Proceedings of the DADA2013 International Conference on Digital Architecture, 2013, Tsinghua University Publishing House, Beijing, 2013, pp. 30-40

Access Restricted

Author Comments

Access Restricted