Should We Save Mid-Century Modern Icons That Hurt the Environment?

Home
Resources
Back

Resources

Building a neutral platform for knowledge sharing is one of our strategic objectives. We are committed to providing deep knowledge assets with tools and processes that promote easy and open access.
Events
Back
Events

Search events produced by FTI, our members and industry partners through the Industry Calendar – a shared calendar specially curated for Facade Geeks!
Membership
Back

Membership

As a member-based non-profit, our membership is comprised of thought leaders from across the building industry doing the urgent work of moving the built environment toward critical health, resilience and sustainability objectives. The facade system is pivotal to this endeavor – amplify your impact by joining us in collective action!
About
Back
About

We are a non-profit member organization intent on moving buildings and urban habitat toward resilience and sustainability goals by leveraging the pervasive influence of the building skin.
- About FTI
- Vision & Mission
- Leadership
- Staff
- Committees
- Awards Program
- FTI News
- Contact
SKINS
Donate to FTI
Sign In

In a feature posted on fastcodedesign.com yesterday, architect James Timberlake charts a course for making ethical decisions about unsustainable modernist architecture. The article discusses the role of the building facade — specifically the viability of retrofit programs for buildings clad by mid-twentieth century curtainwall systems — to simultaneously maintain the aesthetic integrity and reduce carbon emissions of our existing building stock.